My current programme treats AI as a systemic risk object. The organising question is whether claims made about AI systems can be independently checked, and the method I use to answer it is epistemic auditing.
Independent reconstructability. Can an AI claim, output, or system behaviour be reconstructed, verified, attributed, and causally traced, rather than merely judged acceptable? Most existing evaluation stops at acceptability. That is a weaker test, and it lets unverifiable claims pass.
Auditing AI environmental and compute cost claims for measurement consistency, so that figures reported by different organisations can actually be compared.
Auditing the AI stack, covering training, inference and compute, for whether proposed governance is feasible in practice rather than only on paper.
Auditing the integrity of the evidence base that institutions depend on, including the peer-reviewed literature itself.
The recurring pattern in this work is to build a typology, attach a feasibility or severity scoring instrument to it, and then use that instrument to surface a structural gap that was not visible before. A second mode is the controlled measurement study, which produces evidence without training new models.
A second strand examines multilingual model behaviour and per-language governance, from a native multilingual and non-Anglophone standpoint across Latin, Devanagari and Perso-Arabic scripts. The themes are tokenizer cost, English-anchoring in multilingual models, uneven training-data quality between languages, and per-language accountability under European AI regulation.
The full list of 169 items is on the publications page.
Hardware neural networks; analog and current-mode signal processing; machine learning applications; IoT security; privacy-preserving surveillance and human activity recognition; and deep learning for medical imaging. The doctoral work developed feedback neural circuits for solving systems of linear equations, introduced two analog building blocks, and extended the circuits to linear and quadratic programming.
Co-authorship spans Ireland, the United Kingdom, India, the United States, China, Pakistan and Bangladesh.
| Period | Role | Project and funder | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 to 2027 | Co-Investigator | SI2OT, Design of Secure and Intelligent IoT Nodes. FIST scheme, Department of Science and Technology, India. | INR 10,200,000 |
| 2020 to 2024 | Principal Investigator | Presidential Doctoral Scholarship, Athlone Institute of Technology, Ireland. | EUR 105,200 |
| 2020 to 2021 | Co-Investigator | DART, Data Analytics for Real-time Troubleshooting. Enterprise Ireland. | EUR 130,265 of a EUR 200,545 project |
| 2019 to 2020 | Fellow | Post-doctoral fellowship, COMAND Technology Gateway, Enterprise Ireland. | EUR 40,221 per year |
| 2018 to 2019 | Fellow | Post-doctoral fellowship, EU Horizon 2020 PROTECTIVE. | EUR 37,383 per year |
| 2016 to 2018 | Principal Investigator | Visvesaraya Young Faculty Research Fellowship, Ministry of Electronics and IT, India. | INR 3,700,000 |
| 2016 to 2018 | Principal Investigator | Start-Up Project, University Grants Commission, India. | INR 1,000,000 |
Internal awards at the University of Chester: Vice-Chancellor's AI Innovation Fund, 2025 to 2026; Quality Research funding in 2022 and 2023; conference grants in 2024 to 2025 and 2025 to 2026.
4,892 citations, h-index 26, i10-index 51, as measured on Google Scholar on 18 August 2026.